Wednesday, 08 November 2000

MACHINATIONS MAR UZBEKISTAN’S BANKING SYSTEM

Published in Field Reports

By Farangis Said, Tashkent, Uzbekistan (11/8/2000 issue of the CACI Analyst)

The banking system of Uzbekistan experienced significant changes recently when Acting Chairman of the National Bank of Uzbekistan (NBU), Zaynutdin Mirkhodjaev, and his first deputy Georgi An were removed from office at their "own request" according to President Karimov’s decree. But soon Georgi An was charged with "financial machinations" and according to rumors is currently a fugitive from justice. The NBU is the country’s largest bank with USD $400 million and four billion Uzbekistan soms in capital.

The banking system of Uzbekistan experienced significant changes recently when Acting Chairman of the National Bank of Uzbekistan (NBU), Zaynutdin Mirkhodjaev, and his first deputy Georgi An were removed from office at their "own request" according to President Karimov’s decree. But soon Georgi An was charged with "financial machinations" and according to rumors is currently a fugitive from justice. The NBU is the country’s largest bank with USD $400 million and four billion Uzbekistan soms in capital. It is ranked 429 among the top 1000 of the world’s banks in capital holdings and holds 80% of the financial sector of Uzbekistan. NBU’s chairman is of great political importance and therefore the new nomination was impatiently awaited. President Karimov appointed Mamarizo Normuradov, the first deputy chairman of Central Bank.

The changes at the National Bank of Uzbekistan seem to have been the result of illegal or semi-legal financial operations with foreign banks that resulted in both big profits and losses. Bribes where also taken from clients in order to secure loans. It appears that such violations were discovered during recent inspections of the NBU. They were also a result of inter-bank rivalries. Such rivalries were not typical competition among banks that is inherent in a free-market economy, but among the Central Bank and commercial banks, mainly between the Central Bank and the NBU. The fact that the Central Bank discovered, or perhaps arranged, machinations in the NBU means that the rivalry was settled in the Central Bank’s favor. The changes allow Fayzulla Mullajanov, chairman of the Central Bank, to strengthen his political position and influence.

The changes in the banking system appear to be related to inter-clan rivalry for political power. Some of clans aim to weaken the position of finance minister Rustam Azimov who is President Karimov’s favorite. The National Bank of Uzbekistan is Rustam Azimov’s "child". Established by presidential decree in September 1991, the NBU was given all necessary funds, support and privileges. But it was Rustam Azimov who determined the strategy of its development and made the NBU known throughout the world. Despite the fact that Rustam Azimov was appointed as the minister of finance in fall 1998, he remained the NBU’s "godfather" and actively participated in the decision-making process. Azimov was only 33 years old when President Karimov chose him to head the NBU.

At present, 42 year old Azimov is Uzbekistan’s vice-prime minister and has great ambitions to become Karimov’s successor. This is exactly what irritates other clans and causes them to brush him aside. It will soon be clear whether these clans have succeeded in their attempt to weaken his position. Should Azimov be able to appoint the NBU’s first deputy chairman, it would mean that he is still "on the horse". Should a different clan’s representative be appointed first deputy chairman, it will mean that Azimov’s political strength has declined. Whatever the reasons and consequences for these changes in Uzbekistan’s banking system, they must not be harmful to other interested parties, most importantly the NBU itself. It is necessary for the Uzbekistan government to create a "reasonable legend" to explain the changes to the NBU’s foreign partners. As the NBU prepares to sell its 40% stake to foreign investors, its image must not be blemished. The NBU must also remember its important clientele, the Uzbekistan people. While playing political games, Uzbekistan’s politicians and bankers must not forget about the people’s interests.

Farangis Said, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Read 3996 times

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Staff Publications

  

2410Starr-coverSilk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, Greater Central Asia as A Component of U.S. Global Strategy, October 2024. 

Analysis Laura Linderman, "Rising Stakes in Tbilisi as Elections Approach," Civil Georgia, September 7, 2024.

Analysis Mamuka Tsereteli, "U.S. Black Sea Strategy: The Georgian Connection", CEPA, February 9, 2024. 

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell, ed., Türkiye's Return to Central Asia and the Caucasus, July 2024. 

ChangingGeopolitics-cover2Book Svante E. Cornell, ed., "The Changing Geopolitics of Central Asia and the Caucasus" AFPC Press/Armin LEar, 2023. 

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell and S. Frederick Starr, Stepping up to the “Agency Challenge”: Central Asian Diplomacy in a Time of Troubles, July 2023. 

Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 10.32.15 AM

Silk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, U.S. Policy in Central Asia through Central Asian Eyes, May 2023.



 

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter