Monday, 08 March 2004

US CONDEMNED FOR AFGHAN \'ABUSES\'

Published in News Digest

By empty (3/8/2004 issue of the CACI Analyst)

The actions of US military and intelligence units in Afghanistan have been heavily criticised in a new report by an international human rights group. US-based Human Rights Watch accuses US personnel of using excessive force, carrying out arbitrary detentions and mistreating people in custody. Washington keeps about 9,000 troops on Afghan soil, involved primarily in fighting the Taleban and al-Qaeda.
The actions of US military and intelligence units in Afghanistan have been heavily criticised in a new report by an international human rights group. US-based Human Rights Watch accuses US personnel of using excessive force, carrying out arbitrary detentions and mistreating people in custody. Washington keeps about 9,000 troops on Afghan soil, involved primarily in fighting the Taleban and al-Qaeda. But the human rights body says many US actions violate international law. The report is damning. Entitled Enduring Freedom - Abuses by US Forces in Afghanistan, it focuses on the American system of detaining people at bases across the country, which it describes as \"almost entirely outside the rule of law\". According to Human Rights Watch, at least 1,000 Afghans and other nationals have been taken into custody since 2002. These arrests have often been accompanied by excessive or indiscriminate force, it says, leading to death and injury to innocent civilians. Helicopter gunships have been used to fire on residential areas, when US troops were facing no opposition. Once in custody in places like Bagram airbase north of Kabul, mistreatment is common, the human rights group says - detainees are frequently subjected to sleep deprivation, extremes of temperature and in some cases beatings. Two people have died in US detention in Afghanistan, and both cases have been ruled as homicide. Human Rights Watch says these incidents have still not been adequately explained by the Pentagon. The report\'s writer fears \"appropriate criminal and disciplinary action may never take place\". (BBC)
Read 1798 times

Visit also

silkroad

AFPC

isdp

turkeyanalyst

Staff Publications

  

2410Starr-coverSilk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, Greater Central Asia as A Component of U.S. Global Strategy, October 2024. 

Analysis Laura Linderman, "Rising Stakes in Tbilisi as Elections Approach," Civil Georgia, September 7, 2024.

Analysis Mamuka Tsereteli, "U.S. Black Sea Strategy: The Georgian Connection", CEPA, February 9, 2024. 

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell, ed., Türkiye's Return to Central Asia and the Caucasus, July 2024. 

ChangingGeopolitics-cover2Book Svante E. Cornell, ed., "The Changing Geopolitics of Central Asia and the Caucasus" AFPC Press/Armin LEar, 2023. 

Silk Road Paper Svante E. Cornell and S. Frederick Starr, Stepping up to the “Agency Challenge”: Central Asian Diplomacy in a Time of Troubles, July 2023. 

Screen Shot 2023-05-08 at 10.32.15 AM

Silk Road Paper S. Frederick Starr, U.S. Policy in Central Asia through Central Asian Eyes, May 2023.



 

The Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst is a biweekly publication of the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program, a Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center affiliated with the American Foreign Policy Council, Washington DC., and the Institute for Security and Development Policy, Stockholm. For 15 years, the Analyst has brought cutting edge analysis of the region geared toward a practitioner audience.

Newsletter

Sign up for upcoming events, latest news and articles from the CACI Analyst

Newsletter